Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lyle Enright's avatar

I've been thinking about exactly this question a lot lately... I think naming antichrist as "an effort" is a really good approach. I think even Hans Urs von Balthasar tacitly (and I think Ratzinger actually does this explicitly) names "antichrist" as a *specific capacity* of the church. Its inevitable "dark side". One cannot be antichrist without first seeing themselves as "in Christ" and then abusing that position/association. It's the worst kind of oversight about oneself.

Anyway, ao much for keeping our eyes peeled for a blonde, blue-eyed Romanian atheist.

Expand full comment
Lynne McFarland's avatar

Theology is a contact sport

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts